It seems natural at every height of the economic and financial crisis in Syria that there is a discussion and discussion about the proposed solutions.
In the recent crisis that led to this crazy rise in the dollar exchange rate against the Syrian pound, the most important question was:
How can the state secure additional sources of foreign exchange in the light of its blockade?
On a personal level, I am not involved in economic issues, but I will allow myself to present from a legal point of view the premise of seeking to close the direct and indirect losses of foreign exchange and not to search for its sources, including the issue of students who are abroad who have not returned after the expiry of their dispatch.
The idea is not a number because we are talking about a problem that must be solved far from theorizing. The vast majority of these students belong to families who fought for the homeland, and most of them were the lungs through which their families breathed in Syria. Financially in light of the economic crisis, siege and war.
Not only that, the majority of them have already applied for the payment of their funds, and accusing them of stealing the money seems to have repercussions on the absolute, mainly if they were not linked to their homeland and have a desire that these fines do not cause a break in their relationship with their country to such requests. Some of them succeeded and settled the situation and the state has regained all its rights, but others and after making great strides in the settlement went ambitious after the issuance of Legislative Decrees 3 of 2017 and 8 of 2018, where these decrees and unilaterally amended the contractual formula between the Ministry of Higher Education and the envoy The amount to be paid in the event of non-return is twice the amount received, but at the current exchange rate, not as it was in the contract, ie at the rate at the conversion.
If the student received a sum of 100,000 Euros at a transfer rate of sixty five Syrian pounds per euro, then the amount will be doubled in the amount of 13 million Syrian pounds. Today the student will have to give it back by one hundred and twenty million Syrian pounds. This amendment contributed a lot to the students’ reluctance to settle. And some of them have already received decisions of reservations and extended to his family, knowing that everything owned by the family may not cover one tenth of this amount, what is the solution?
Certainly the state has the right to seek to guarantee its rights.All of us will return with the looted or lost state funds, but not by retroactive and unilateral amendment of the contract.No contract can be held according to the law of dispatch in 2004 with a law issued in 2018.The delegates admit that they have to pay It follows, but at the same time, demonizing them and treating them as an outlaw class did not solve the problem, but simply created a thousand problems. Why wait?
In summary, this issue is one of the lost wealth that must be reconsidered in the hope of finding a compromise that will relieve all parties. It is part of the lost losses or wealth that we should try to recover, because in such a case we are depriving the state of recovering the money that was spent at the time. In the meantime, we are depriving nearly a thousand Syrian families from visiting their homeland as citizens whose nationality no one doubts, despite their previous reneging on the commitment of return, which may have its causes and the infusion of the family. And in the market or in the investment.

Translated from Alwatan News Syria

Wealth is missing

| Alwatan News Syria | 0 Comments
About The Author

Leave a Reply

Notify of